How Does Classifying the Three Types of Resistance to Occupation Help Him Develop His Thesis?

How Does Classifying the Three Types of Resistance to Occupation Help Him Develop His Thesis?

How Does Classifying the Three Types of Resistance to Occupation Help Him Develop His Thesis?

Martin Luther King Jr. discusses violence, acquiescence, and nonviolent resistance. He uses an organizational pattern to discuss these topics, as it builds his argument. Without this structure, his thesis would be ineffective. King sees advantages and disadvantages for each. He also argues that nonviolent resistance is the most powerful form of resistance. He describes these advantages and disadvantages, and discusses how each of these options will benefit the cause of freedom and equality.

Nonviolent resistance

The way in which Martin Luther King organized his argument was by contrasting violence and acquiescence. He arranged them in order of difficulty to develop his thesis. The advantages and disadvantages of each type are then discussed. If the topics were discussed in a different order, his argument would not have been as strong. The argument is strengthened by considering the benefits of nonviolent resistance to oppression.

The process of nonviolent resistance enlists all men of good will to act against oppression. The nonviolent resistance process does not target oppressors or racial groups, but rather, it seeks to address the problem from an affective and moral standpoint. The method of nonviolent resistance should be sufficient for solving oppression. Nonviolent resistance helped Martin Luther King combat black prejudice in America. At that time, violent methods had failed to achieve long-term results.

The nonviolent resistance process involves refusing to return violence in kind. This means that the nonviolent resister is willing to take the blows that his opponent gives without striking back. If he must use violence, however, he is prepared to do so if necessary. Nonviolent resistance helps him develop his thesis by opposing violence with the philosophy of suffering. This teaches him that the law of the jungle is not always right, but it does help to open the opponent’s mind.

While some research indicates that nonviolent resistance to oppression is effective in confronting a sophisticated and genocidal regime, other research has cast doubt on its success. Some regimes have been far more committed to violence, including the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria. As a result, the nonviolent approach to oppression is more effective than violence, and the results are much better.

In the 1960s, Martin Luther King Jr. led the civil rights movement. In The Ways of Meeting Oppression, he argues that nonviolent resistance is more effective than violent resistance. To illustrate this, King uses rhetorical devices and advanced vocabulary to present three real life methods of encountering oppression. He compares their benefits and disadvantages. This is a good use of comparison and contrast and advanced vocabulary.

In recent years, the scale of mass nonviolent movements has diminished. But they remain impressive. In Venezuela, in 2017, millions of people demonstrated against President Nicolas Maduro. In Chile, millions of people took to the streets to protest the government. Yet recent movements have been much smaller than the massive demonstrations of the 1980s. In contrast, a decade ago, fewer than two percent of the population participated in a nonviolent campaign.


Martin Luther King Jr. begins his essay by discussing the differences between nonviolent resistance and violent resistance. He utilizes an organizational pattern to discuss these issues. Without this structure, his argument would be weak. King contrasts these three types of resistance to oppression and outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each. He also uses advanced vocabulary. In Para. 5, King says that violence is immoral and explains why nonviolent resistance is preferable to violence.

While violence has the potential to destroy power, it always results in counterproductive action. Throughout history, violent resistance has been unsuccessful. Thus, it is prudent to use organized dissent to weaken the state’s power. Only through dialogue and political movement can groups begin to undermine the power of the state. This strategy does not necessarily require violence, but does have many advantages. Thompson’s thesis is difficult to implement.

Violence as a form of resistance to oppression has some benefits and many disadvantages. It draws attention to the oppressor and creates a social barrier between races. As King said, ‘an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind.’ Therefore, violence is a wrong choice for oppressed people. In addition to being counterproductive, violence also makes the oppressor’s position harder to defend.

Camus points out the need to balance political debate and violent resistance as well as peaceful methods to change a regime. A better understanding of power is crucial for correcting an oppressive regime. This is necessary for peaceful change. It helps him develop his thesis by emphasizing the importance of understanding the difference between oppression and violence. So, if you want to change the world, you must understand the history behind violent resistance and its consequences.

The history of violent resistance to oppression is littered with examples of oppression. The American Revolution is a prime example, as George Washington and the British government refused to enlist Black men. In fact, they believed that employing Black American soldiers would help the war end. In the South, John Murray and Charles Cobb actively recruited former slaves to enlist in Dunmore’s “Ethiopian Regiment” to defend the civil rights movement.

For instance, in an abusive relationship, violence by an oppressed person can be seen as a rational appeal to the self-interest of the oppressor. The violence perpetrated by the oppressor then delegitimizes the oppressor in the eyes of the observers, allowing them to become allies of the oppressed. However, if the oppressor is a stably nonviolent regime, then the use of violence by the oppressed person is justified.


The three basic forms of resistance to oppression are acquiescence, violence, and nonviolent action. The first two methods are ineffective; they lead to more problems and complications, but do not change the status quo. In contrast, the third method, nonviolent action, encourages people to confront their oppressors head-on. Both methods are counterproductive, as they result in further abuses of the victim.

King used a logical organizational principle to build his argument. He argued that nonviolent action is more effective and efficient than either violence or acquiescence. The argument would have been flawed if he had discussed the three types of resistance in any other order. In fact, the three types of resistance are best suited for different types of situations. King arranged them in order of difficulty.

The nonviolent approach is the most effective method of dealing with oppression. It seeks results from other forms of resistance, and avoids the negative aspects of all three. Nonviolent resistance is the most moral and affective way to confront oppression. Martin Luther King, for example, dealt with the problem of racism and prejudice by using nonviolent methods. While his actions were less effective, they did produce long-term results.

Nonviolent resistance is the third form of resistance to oppression. This type of resistance ends in defeat and reconciles the qualities of violence and acquiescence. The last method is nonviolent resistance. The most significant aspect of nonviolent resistance is that it doesn’t resort to violence, but rather acknowledges the characteristics of each form. If we are unable to do so, we are merely accepting what has happened to us.

King’s essay “The Ways of Meeting Oppression” reveals several different forms of nonviolent resistance. In his essay, he clearly defines three real life forms of resistance to oppression and compares their benefits and disadvantages. Nonviolent resistance helps many people realize that their struggles can be overcome without violence. While violence and acquiescence can sometimes be effective, nonviolent action is more effective.

For more help with thesis writing, read these articles:

  1. Write literary analysis essay – Step by Step instructions
  2. thesis writing assistance – Professional thesis writing service
  3. Guide on writing thesis statement
  4. Steps for writing Master’s thesis proposal