How to Write the Discussion Chapter in PhD Thesis?
How to Write the Discussion Chapter in PhD Thesis?
There are many rules and tips on how to write the discussion chapter in your PhD thesis. Here are a few of them: Structure of the discussion chapter, Analyzing new results and introducing claims about new knowledge, and using the grammatical first person. While writing your discussion chapter, try to follow these guidelines. They will help you write a strong discussion chapter that is well-received by your readers.
Structure of discussion chapter
The structure of your discussion chapter is critical to your PhD thesis. The chapter should be short, fully state your conclusions and support them, and avoid regurgitating previous research results. Avoid side issues that will only make your thesis look unprofessional. Focus on helping your reader decide whether your findings are factual or mere speculation. The structure of your discussion chapter should go from specific to general. The following are some tips to keep in mind when writing this section.
The first paragraph of your discussion chapter should explain the results. It should also include the limitations of the study. The literature review should provide evidence of the results of your study. The literature review should also explain how your findings relate to your hypothesis. In the conclusion, your findings should indicate what direction your research should take. It is important to acknowledge any limitations in your research, such as the sample size. A small sample may not have enough power to generalize the findings.
The next section in your PhD thesis is the results chapter. This chapter ties in your results to previous studies and literature. It looks at the significance of the data you’ve collected and helps to explain your research questions. It also supports your overall conclusions. You should focus on the findings that are directly related to your research questions, and avoid spending too much time on findings that aren’t relevant. If you want to include a discussion chapter in your PhD thesis, you should write it according to the guidelines outlined above.
Analyzing new results
The purpose of the discussion chapter is to interpret the results of research and relate them to the research questions and the literature. The discussion chapter provides the reader with the evidence to support the main argument. It is also important to evaluate the significance of the results and make concrete recommendations for further investigation. This section should be carefully thought out and should present a logical argument to support the research findings.
An excellent discussion chapter should begin with a literature review. This will help place the new research into context and set the discussion in the proper context. The previous research will greatly influence the general significance of the research, so it is important to compare the results of the new study with other research to help the reader draw conclusions. As with any research work, there are inherent limitations to the study. The researcher should acknowledge these limitations and contrast them to those of other studies.
The fourth step in writing the discussion chapter is to identify limitations. Consider whether the new results are based on a new theoretical framework or a general theory. The sample may be small or unique, which may limit the generalizability of the results. When writing the discussion chapter, consider the impact on the field as a whole. Your work should not be viewed as a novelty or a fluke, but rather as a genuine contribution to the field.
Introducing new knowledge claims
A PhD thesis’ discussion chapter is the problem child of the dissertation. It can provoke fear, uncertainty, and doubt, but it’s also where the creative magic of the PhD happens. It requires the introduction of new knowledge claims. These claims are like dumplings in the soup of a PhD thesis. They should be treated like chocolate chips, and the reader should be able to discern the relation between them and the main claims.
When writing a discussion chapter, it is important to acknowledge limitations and discuss the implications of your findings. Limitations can include the sample size, theoretical basis, or analysis methods used. For example, a study conducted on a very small sample may not be able to generalise its results. Likewise, a research study on a single subject may be limited by the nature of the sample.
In the discussion section of a PhD thesis, new knowledge claims are introduced by explaining the significance of your findings. Remember that the goal of social science research is to discover, not prove. In the discussion chapter, you should consider all possible explanations rather than only the ones that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions. Make sure you do this by following a general order. This way, your readers will understand the significance of your findings.
Using grammatical first person
The discussion chapter is an important part of the PhD thesis. Here are six key components of a good discussion chapter:
Use the first person to talk about yourself. While it is acceptable to use the first person in a PhD thesis, it is not appropriate in a dissertation. The discussion chapter is the most important part of the thesis. It is important to avoid using the first person too often. First-person is a powerful grammatical form, but it can come across as intrusive.
Second, a good discussion chapter will contextualize your research findings. You will be able to tie your findings back to literature and previous research, and make an argument for the conclusions you draw from your analysis. You can also make use of the first person to interact with your research findings. It is important to use a coherent explanation, and don’t forget to give your research questions a place in your chapter.
Length of section
The length of the Discussion chapter in a PhD thesis depends on the type of topic it covers. It should be brief, but should adequately state the results and support your conclusions. Avoid reiterating your findings as it can lead the reader to forget the main purpose of your research. Also, avoid rambling about side issues, as they may cloud the message. The discussion chapter should be structured from specific to general, to enable the reader to draw conclusions based on the results.
A good discussion chapter begins with a literature review, which presents the results of previous research. This is an essential step in any PhD thesis, as it gives readers a framework on which to build their own work. The length of this chapter is normally between 30 and 40 pages. Next, the discussion chapter explains the research methods used and relates the findings to the hypothesis. The literature review should be around 10 pages, and it should be relevant to the research question.
The main body of the PhD thesis is divided into several chapters, including the methods and the discussion. The first section contains the research findings and should be approximately 10 pages long. It should also contain the conclusion, refuted hypotheses, and methods. The second section, the discussion chapter, should be between 15 and 20 pages long, and should describe the implications of the research. It should diversify the current evidence base and acknowledge its limitations.
Including critical reflections
There are six core components of the discussion chapter in a PhD thesis. When writing the chapter, consider these components as steps in the writing process. These components will provide the reader with context for your research and provide a clear understanding of the purpose of your PhD thesis. Here are some tips to help you write a discussion chapter that demonstrates your critical thinking. You may want to include a bullet point list of the findings of your PhD thesis, so you can refer to it as you write the chapter.
The fourth step in writing a discussion chapter is acknowledging limitations. Limitations may include scope, theoretical basis, analysis methodology, and sample size. A sample that has a small number of unique characteristics may not be representative of the population. As such, you must explain how your research was constrained. And, if the results are too limited to be generalisable, acknowledge those limitations.
The final act of the thesis is to reflect on what you’ve learned. In some fields, this is a required step. When writing a PhD thesis, the discussion chapter itself becomes a look-back on what you’ve learned throughout your PhD. Some examiners also prefer learning-focused reflections. Some even ask candidates to share what they’ve learned during the process.
For more information, do visit
OUR FREE SERVICES